Virology Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Virology, including details on viruses, pathology, classification, definitions.

Mutations at codons 54 and 82 of HIV protease predict virological response of HIV-infected children on salvage lopinavir/ritonavir therapy.

Luis Jiménez J, Resino S, Martinez-Colom A, Bellón JM, Angeles Muñoz-Fernández M,

Laboratory of Immunobiología-Molecular, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

BACKGROUND: Lopinavir/ritonavir is a protease inhibitor (PI) that has shown great effectiveness as salvage therapy in PI-experienced HIV-infected children. OBJECTIVES: To study whether mutations in the HIV-1 protease gene can reliably predict virological responses to salvage therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective study in 56 HIV-infected children. PI-associated resistance mutations were determined by genotypic testing and were scored according to the IAS-USA guidelines 2005. RESULTS: Children with a 'lopinavir mutation score' (LMS) > or = 6 had a negative association for achieving viral load (VL) control [undetectable viral load (uVL) < or = 400 copies/mL] and maintaining uVL for at least 6 months. Moreover, children with protease-associated mutations (PRAMs) > or = 2 had a negative association for achieving VL control but not for maintaining uVL for at least 6 months. The relative proportion (RP) to uVL was 0.32 (CI95%: 0.16; 0.33; P = 0.002) in children with I54V (46% of total) and 0.48 (CI95%: 0.24; 0.97; P = 0.041) in children with V82A/F (52% of total). Children with I54V and V82A/F had higher prevalence of lopinavir-associated resistance mutations and showed RP of 0.36 (CI95%: 0.17; 0.76; P = 0.007) for achieving uVL. CONCLUSIONS: LMS and PRAMs in HIV-infected children were associated with virological failure in pre-treated HIV-infected children on salvage therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir. Moreover, I54V and V82A/F led to the poorest virological response.

Published 12 December 2005 in J Antimicrob Chemother, 56(6): 1081-6.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

© 2005-2008 Virology Research Today. All Rights Reserved.